Had a conversation with Mrs last night. Quite tense at times.
She reassured me to some degree that it is only little parts of thhe Bible that she challenges, she still respects it overall. And she emphasised quite strongly that she LIVES the gospel, and so takes issue with my suggestion that she is undermining it.
But I can't really agree that it is 'little parts'.
She says:
Daniel is a myth
John's gospel was severely editted and added to by others - so for example the bit about being 'born again' was a later addition
Many of Paul's letters were not by him.
The parts that were written by Paul include his [sinful] prejudices
So basically, what is left?
As Paul says, "He who has broken one part of the law has broken all of it".
No comments:
Post a Comment