Wikipedia, Todd Bentley and faith healing

I was looking at the terribly biased Wikipedia article against Todd Bentley. It is fairly up to date, even including details of his recent marriage difficulties. (The devil likes to strike the shepherd so that the sheep will be scattered). I always thought that Wikipedia articles were supposed to be neutral, and yet the article is clearly written by an opponent and shows quite terrible bias. Yes they have checked out negative the stuff they quote to make sure it is true etc, but there is no balancing positive information.

They also throw doubt on his claims of faith healing, putting the phrase in inverted commas to indicate their scepticism. In the discussion they justify this by saying that until there is scientific proof of faith healing, they can’t write it as factual, and therefore have to put the inverted commas, and refer to the Wikipedia article on faith healing.

The trouble is, science is the wrong tool to measure faith healing.

For one thing, it’s impossible to get evidence from a doctor because no matter how miraculous it is they will never say ‘God did it’ or ‘it’s a miracle’ – only that ‘the patient went through a spontaneous recovery’. There is therefore a circular logic in the scientific approach – they shut their eyes and then say that God doesn’t exist because they can’t see him.

Secondly, science has to be repeatable. But God is not one of the laws of phyics of the universe to be tested in that way. He is an individual, who does what he wants when he wants to. He is not a machine where you push the button and the mechanism works to deliver the product. His individuality and his scorn for human ‘wisdom’ mean that he will never subject himself as a divine lab-rat. So you try to scientifically measure the effect of prayer, and he won’t play along. But on the other hand, a friend of mine whose daughter was in the Alder Hey children’s hospital in Liverpool, England, told me that staff there say that the children of families that pray do have a better chance of survival.

The fact is, some people do experience genuine healing at these events. My colleague showed me before and after MRI scans and accompanying doctor's letters - the earlier dated one said he had asbestosis and on that basis he had successfully sued his former employer and was waiting for the cheque. The later dated one stated he had no asbestosis, and on the basis of this he had waived the compensation payment. Between the two scans he had been to a Christian faith healing meeting [not one of Todd Bentley's] and been healed suddenly, miraculously and permanently in the aisle before he even reached the front. It's anecdotal, but its still 100% true.

And my own wife has experienced a partial healing of her rheumatoid arthritis when she was ‘slain in the spirit’ at our church, and now that she is due for a flare up after the birth of our baby, and her hands were starting to get stiff, she asked for prayer again last Sunday and on Monday the pain had reduced – in her words from 7/10 to 5/10.

In Scripture, physical healing and forgiveness are often mentioned side by side, as a couplet or as phrases within the sentence. So, if you don’t believe that God heals today, why do you still believe that he forgives you today?