Lead the 9:30 this sunday. Generally went well, but I forgot the Lord's prayer and had to tag it on after the sermon. Also, because I am nervous, I look very down in the mouth. I need to learn to smile reassuringly, even if I am in a panic.
I was supposed to be distibuting communion in the 11:00 service, but since Church of England rules require an ordained minster to officiate (Where is that in the Bible?) and they were all away at the Curate's ordination, the congregation was deprived.
I was preaching in the evening service. It seemed to go down well, though of course people that weren't impressed don't say so unless they disagree strongly. But the Vicar seemed happy with it, so i feel happy too.
Rest!
Monday, June 11
Recanting recanting.
I was telling my son about Cranmer putting into the flames the hand that had signed a document recanting his protestant faith.
I was about to recant some of my previous post - it was too harsh, to critical, with not enough room for variety in the church. But then I read in the Church of England newspaper that some senior American theologian with support from her bishop has said she sees no reason why a muslim could not be a minister in the Epsicopal Church, and that the Jesus she has been following has been leading her into Islam. So does she not understand Islam, or does she not understand Christ? Or more likely, neither?
So I recant recanting. I believe what I believe, and if your core beliefs are congruent with mine we can have fellowship, and if you believe something else, then obviously fellowship can't exist becasue we were never fellows, regardless of labels that try to lump us together..
I was about to recant some of my previous post - it was too harsh, to critical, with not enough room for variety in the church. But then I read in the Church of England newspaper that some senior American theologian with support from her bishop has said she sees no reason why a muslim could not be a minister in the Epsicopal Church, and that the Jesus she has been following has been leading her into Islam. So does she not understand Islam, or does she not understand Christ? Or more likely, neither?
So I recant recanting. I believe what I believe, and if your core beliefs are congruent with mine we can have fellowship, and if you believe something else, then obviously fellowship can't exist becasue we were never fellows, regardless of labels that try to lump us together..
Saturday, June 9
Am I a Christian?
Well, yes, but only in a co-incidental sort of way - it's not a label I pay too much attention to.
Let me explain.
I believe the stuff in my 'Bullets of truth' down at the bottom of my sidebar. I believe that God, incarnate in Jesus, took on himslef the punishment he had decreed for my rebellions agianst him, on the cross, and that this is revealed in the Scripture, together with an indicatio of how I should respond.
Having decided all this, I then take stock and look around, and find that this set of beliefs falls within a very broad set of religions collectively known as 'Christianity'. So i am a Christian.
But I also find that there are a lot of people, whose religion is fundamentally different to mine, or has only some peripheral overlap with mine, who are also called Christians, becasue the definition of 'Christianity' is so broad that almost anyone born coincidentally in Europe or America fits in.
And then, beacuase Jesus appealed for unity, i am expected to be united with this bunch of people who are really members of different religions, which just happen to have the same label attached.
And if I make noises that, well, I'm not actually the same as them, it sounds as if I am promoting schism. But i'm not - I never was anything to do with them, I just wonder how it is that the same labels came to be attached. I'm not asking for division, I'm aking for it to be recognised that I was never united to them. I'm not asking for divorce, i'm asking for annulment. There was never a valid marriage. Apart from a broad belief in Jesus - which even demons share - I'm nothing to do with them.
I have the beliefs I have stated. I have fellowship with those that share them or something reasonably similar (Although I recognise that often they will not express them in these terms). People that don't share them, are (frankly) a different religion. Please don't put me in the same basket.
Let me explain.
I believe the stuff in my 'Bullets of truth' down at the bottom of my sidebar. I believe that God, incarnate in Jesus, took on himslef the punishment he had decreed for my rebellions agianst him, on the cross, and that this is revealed in the Scripture, together with an indicatio of how I should respond.
Having decided all this, I then take stock and look around, and find that this set of beliefs falls within a very broad set of religions collectively known as 'Christianity'. So i am a Christian.
But I also find that there are a lot of people, whose religion is fundamentally different to mine, or has only some peripheral overlap with mine, who are also called Christians, becasue the definition of 'Christianity' is so broad that almost anyone born coincidentally in Europe or America fits in.
And then, beacuase Jesus appealed for unity, i am expected to be united with this bunch of people who are really members of different religions, which just happen to have the same label attached.
And if I make noises that, well, I'm not actually the same as them, it sounds as if I am promoting schism. But i'm not - I never was anything to do with them, I just wonder how it is that the same labels came to be attached. I'm not asking for division, I'm aking for it to be recognised that I was never united to them. I'm not asking for divorce, i'm asking for annulment. There was never a valid marriage. Apart from a broad belief in Jesus - which even demons share - I'm nothing to do with them.
I have the beliefs I have stated. I have fellowship with those that share them or something reasonably similar (Although I recognise that often they will not express them in these terms). People that don't share them, are (frankly) a different religion. Please don't put me in the same basket.
Friday, June 8
Health and Safety
If I want to visit a site to get my tape measure out and find out how wide a channel is, I now have to complete 4 (F O U R) health and safety forms and send them to the site 5 days in advance.
Fixed Penalty
Yes, I got one.
I could argue the mitigating circumstances - that the gap I went for closed up on me and I had to take evasive action or get smashed (which is why the police saw me shoot between the cars) and that was why I was still going to fast when we got to the roadworks. However, I have had it coming for a long time, and even if it was a bit unfair today, i accept it for all the times I have deserved it and got away with it.
But in the light of current discusion as to the nature of Christ's atonement, and whether the penalty he paid was a simple consequence of our sins or a judicial punishement for our breaches of God's law, perhaps I should have asked the policemen whether the my fixed penalty notice was a judicial punishment for breaking the speed limit or whether it was just nature taking its course.
(I suspect the natural consequences of speeding would be a traffic accident, whereas a fine seems strongly judicial).
Put simply - in common language and in theology a 'penalty' is a punishment for breaking the law.
I could argue the mitigating circumstances - that the gap I went for closed up on me and I had to take evasive action or get smashed (which is why the police saw me shoot between the cars) and that was why I was still going to fast when we got to the roadworks. However, I have had it coming for a long time, and even if it was a bit unfair today, i accept it for all the times I have deserved it and got away with it.
But in the light of current discusion as to the nature of Christ's atonement, and whether the penalty he paid was a simple consequence of our sins or a judicial punishement for our breaches of God's law, perhaps I should have asked the policemen whether the my fixed penalty notice was a judicial punishment for breaking the speed limit or whether it was just nature taking its course.
(I suspect the natural consequences of speeding would be a traffic accident, whereas a fine seems strongly judicial).
Put simply - in common language and in theology a 'penalty' is a punishment for breaking the law.
Tuesday, June 5
Substitution
Imagine the scene.
Following several high-profile cases of child abduction, rape and murder in the UK a few years ago, there was a media campaign to name known peadophiles. Vigilante mobs of outraged parents scoured the streets looking for them. A lady doctor, advertising as a paediatrician, had bricks thrown through her windows becasue the mob confused peadiatrician and peadophile.
Now, strange as this request may be, place yourslef in the mind of the paedophile. He cowers in his home, hearing the angry mob outside and seeing bricks come crashing in. and understand that this man - foul though he is - represents you. Yes his sins are more identifiable than yours, but sin is sin. And the mob outside is an embodyment of God's own outrage at the sins of the paedophile. (Not that God is a vigilante - he acts within the law - it's just the sense of justified outrage that I'm trying to picture)
So there we have it - the sinner confronted with the anger his sin has caused.
At this moment, in my picture, Christ appears in the house. he takes on the appearence of the peadophile, opens the door, and walks out. The shrill roar of the crowd reaches a crescendo, and christ is enveloped in a flurry of beating hands, kicking feet, spit, sticks, bricks - until his lifeless body is dragged away.
This illustration has many serious theological flaws eg having a wild mob to represent God's wrath, and it plays to the Girardian atonement concept that I have criticised before, and doesn't mention resurrection - but the picture of Christ taking my deserved punishment has been powerful for me these last few days.
Following several high-profile cases of child abduction, rape and murder in the UK a few years ago, there was a media campaign to name known peadophiles. Vigilante mobs of outraged parents scoured the streets looking for them. A lady doctor, advertising as a paediatrician, had bricks thrown through her windows becasue the mob confused peadiatrician and peadophile.
Now, strange as this request may be, place yourslef in the mind of the paedophile. He cowers in his home, hearing the angry mob outside and seeing bricks come crashing in. and understand that this man - foul though he is - represents you. Yes his sins are more identifiable than yours, but sin is sin. And the mob outside is an embodyment of God's own outrage at the sins of the paedophile. (Not that God is a vigilante - he acts within the law - it's just the sense of justified outrage that I'm trying to picture)
So there we have it - the sinner confronted with the anger his sin has caused.
At this moment, in my picture, Christ appears in the house. he takes on the appearence of the peadophile, opens the door, and walks out. The shrill roar of the crowd reaches a crescendo, and christ is enveloped in a flurry of beating hands, kicking feet, spit, sticks, bricks - until his lifeless body is dragged away.
This illustration has many serious theological flaws eg having a wild mob to represent God's wrath, and it plays to the Girardian atonement concept that I have criticised before, and doesn't mention resurrection - but the picture of Christ taking my deserved punishment has been powerful for me these last few days.
Thank you, Lord Jesus!
Monday, June 4
Suicide risk post abortion
Follow this link for information about the increased risk of suicide following an abortion.
The article contains some statistics which i believe are misleading. it compares suicide rates among women who give birth and women who terminate. Not surprisingly, those who have abortions are more likely to commit suicide, and as a conservative evangelical christian you might expect me to jump up and shout "that proves it" - but i am skeptical of statistics which neglect the act that the ones opting for abortion were coming from a much more stressed condition to start with - otherwise they probably wouldn't be asking for the abortion in the first place.
I do believe that the balance of counselling in the UK is biased towards abortion and neglects its negative consequences, and I support the idea that women should know the full picture before making a choice. But I don't think one can seriously expect women to become experts on the issues and long term effects and make a balanced decision when the clock is ticking towards the legal limit.
In fact, whenever i hear about thsi kind of thing it is usually "ms X made the very difficult ecision to terminate"....and it usually makes me wonder if choice is really in the woman's best interest ...should we be dumping these difficult choices on them at their most vulnerable time?
In the end, although everyone always says "It's the woman's body", the child is not - it has a different genetic make up and has its own life and history and existance.
The other thing that really winds me up is the double speak that goes on. If a child is wanted, it is always refered to as 'the unborn child'. For example, if a woman 14 weeks pregnant is murdered, the news reports will say that she and her unborn child died in the attack. The child is included as a victim. But, if the woman has decided she doesn't want the baby, all of a sudden and quite irrationally, the language is changed (although the baby does not) and it is suddenly referred to by impersonal medical terms such as 'foetus'. Isn't this dehumanisation of the victim the way armies and terrorist groups justify their actions and pursuade their mebers to kill?
So it is this double speak more than anything else that tells me that in the final analysis abortion is murder.
But having said that, in the Bible, lesser punishments are prescribed for killing a foetus than for killing a baby after birth. so although it does have a right to life and its killing is wrong, it does not share the same rights as a baby after birth.
I'm enjoying writing this but I must stop and go home.
The article contains some statistics which i believe are misleading. it compares suicide rates among women who give birth and women who terminate. Not surprisingly, those who have abortions are more likely to commit suicide, and as a conservative evangelical christian you might expect me to jump up and shout "that proves it" - but i am skeptical of statistics which neglect the act that the ones opting for abortion were coming from a much more stressed condition to start with - otherwise they probably wouldn't be asking for the abortion in the first place.
I do believe that the balance of counselling in the UK is biased towards abortion and neglects its negative consequences, and I support the idea that women should know the full picture before making a choice. But I don't think one can seriously expect women to become experts on the issues and long term effects and make a balanced decision when the clock is ticking towards the legal limit.
In fact, whenever i hear about thsi kind of thing it is usually "ms X made the very difficult ecision to terminate"....and it usually makes me wonder if choice is really in the woman's best interest ...should we be dumping these difficult choices on them at their most vulnerable time?
In the end, although everyone always says "It's the woman's body", the child is not - it has a different genetic make up and has its own life and history and existance.
The other thing that really winds me up is the double speak that goes on. If a child is wanted, it is always refered to as 'the unborn child'. For example, if a woman 14 weeks pregnant is murdered, the news reports will say that she and her unborn child died in the attack. The child is included as a victim. But, if the woman has decided she doesn't want the baby, all of a sudden and quite irrationally, the language is changed (although the baby does not) and it is suddenly referred to by impersonal medical terms such as 'foetus'. Isn't this dehumanisation of the victim the way armies and terrorist groups justify their actions and pursuade their mebers to kill?
So it is this double speak more than anything else that tells me that in the final analysis abortion is murder.
But having said that, in the Bible, lesser punishments are prescribed for killing a foetus than for killing a baby after birth. so although it does have a right to life and its killing is wrong, it does not share the same rights as a baby after birth.
I'm enjoying writing this but I must stop and go home.
Biblical inerrancy.
Rev Sam put me on to this, which I have found to be very helpful.
It shows that in some of my posts and comments on other blogs on the topic of inerrancy I have fallen into the usual pit of interpreting American words in a British context. The inerrancy i have been defending is not the same as the inerrancy that has been attacked.
It shows that in some of my posts and comments on other blogs on the topic of inerrancy I have fallen into the usual pit of interpreting American words in a British context. The inerrancy i have been defending is not the same as the inerrancy that has been attacked.
Tight Schedule IV
I managed to swap my warden duty from the 10th to the 3rd of June. this worked great - in fact the other guy phoned me first asking for exactly the same swap!
I didn't have to lead the service, but I was still on the rota for intercessions. I was preparing these, but kept getting called away for stuff and never managed to meet the church pastoral assistant, who normally updates me with appropriate matters for the intercessions. And so my prayers were very good in themselves, but not very comprehensive.
In the second service they were having a Bolivian theme, since we are sending a group of peolpe there this summer to support our missionary's work with the children of prisoners that have to live in the jail with teir parents. So there were Spanish songs, and they asked me to do the Lord's prayer in Spanish. Well, I managed to convince most people that I speak the language.
I didn't have to lead the service, but I was still on the rota for intercessions. I was preparing these, but kept getting called away for stuff and never managed to meet the church pastoral assistant, who normally updates me with appropriate matters for the intercessions. And so my prayers were very good in themselves, but not very comprehensive.
In the second service they were having a Bolivian theme, since we are sending a group of peolpe there this summer to support our missionary's work with the children of prisoners that have to live in the jail with teir parents. So there were Spanish songs, and they asked me to do the Lord's prayer in Spanish. Well, I managed to convince most people that I speak the language.
Friday, June 1
Find Madeleine
Tiny Madeleine McCann was abducted while on Holiday in Portugal. Her parents and family are devastated, and nations mourn with them.
If you have any information that might help, please get in touch at www.findmadeleine.com/.
Obviously she is not the only child to be abducted. If you can re-unite any child with its parents, please don't stay silent!
If you have any information that might help, please get in touch at www.findmadeleine.com/.
Obviously she is not the only child to be abducted. If you can re-unite any child with its parents, please don't stay silent!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)